返回列表 發帖
原帖由 Judypuggy 於 2008-7-16 11:16 發表
其實我住MT我無收, 不過我friend 住LP, 佢俾左封信我睇, 我覺得好懷疑,於是打左電話去, 佢一時話自己住10座, 一時又話7座, 有時又話收HK$500 for checking, 我話甘貴時佢又話收HK$400, 海鮮價.....又叫人隨緣樂助... ...


我又明解! 咁拿一張寫給公益金的支票給他, 隨綠樂助, 佢應該會幫我檢查吓

TOP

:o 我都收到了~

TOP

原帖由 Judypuggy 於 2008-7-16 11:16 發表
其實我住MT我無收, 不過我friend 住LP, 佢俾左封信我睇, 我覺得好懷疑,於是打左電話去, 佢一時話自己住10座, 一時又話7座, 有時又話收HK$500 for checking, 我話甘貴時佢又話收HK$400, 海鮮價.....又叫人隨緣樂助... ...


所以我冇打算理個封信



TOP

回復 33# ccc 的帖子

me too

TOP

咁究竟佢係邊間公司架?我住MT 都無收過這種信。

[ 本帖最後由 HI-NU 於 2008-7-17 23:31 編輯 ]

TOP

尋晚收到 MO 既信, 話有人誤導, 又講左我地既線係符合標準的, 又話可能會追究呢位人兄 !

TOP

原帖由 lepoint 於 2008-7-23 09:38 發表
尋晚收到 MO 既信, 話有人誤導, 又講左我地既線係符合標準的, 又話可能會追究呢位人兄 !


若這的誤導, 就一定要追究啦, 誹謗罪喎!

TOP

原帖由 kentcck 於 2008-7-23 09:56 發表


若這的誤導, 就一定要追究啦, 誹謗罪喎!


agreed !

TOP

原帖由 lepoint 於 2008-7-23 09:38 發表
尋晚收到 MO 既信, 話有人誤導, 又講左我地既線係符合標準的, 又話可能會追究呢位人兄 !


查實收到傑仔既信...去到最後就覺得好有問題...btw...mo出得應該安全上起碼合格
小魔怪跌左落水變多左個出黎...

TOP

indeed mo doesn't appoint a third party to check the e-system. The one used by CK may be the same quality of CK, and all the responsibility put to this company, not CK. At least we should obtain guarantee from CK, not the 邁進. a shell can close easily unless it is a strong company, anyone have idea on 邁進?

TOP

原帖由 kentcck 於 2008-7-23 09:56 發表


若這的誤導, 就一定要追究啦, 誹謗罪喎!





TOP

原帖由 pulses 於 2008-7-23 19:27 發表
indeed mo doesn't appoint a third party to check the e-system. The one used by CK may be the same quality of CK, and all the responsibility put to this company, not CK. At least we should obtain guara ...


According to the letter from MO, CK has put a copy of the government license details at Club House. You may find the club staff to check on it. If you gonna check it, kindly share with us your results. Thanks!

TOP

我都睇過, 但我相信其內容
長江大集團
你點同佢鬥...

連住客都唔團結...
有識之士都唔敢出聲啦...

[ 本帖最後由 keegan 於 2008-11-14 16:47 編輯 ]

TOP

返回列表